Solar Power

Peter Maloney writes in his article, Environmentalists Against solar Power that solar big businessman projects are set about major scrutiny, not from the ember or anoint industry, tho from environmentalists. Maloney consecrates that Southern atomic number 20 is displace for solar power in the depopulate grow the bill of sunlight with virtually no clouds, but its in addition the home to the Mojave ground squirrel, the depopulate tortoise and the burrowing owl, and to homophile re positionnts. Maloney too states that the US Bureau of Land counseling says that it had applications submitted for solar power that would c everyplace 78,490 kingdom in the desert. For the whole US, the number of applications grew from zero two eld past to much than 125 with enouch potential electric power of 70,000 megawatts or the equivalent to 70 elephantine coal plants.The rush to try and get this estate is caused by a California Law that calls for 20 share of the states electrici ty must come from renewable resources by 2010. Jim Harvey, who is the founder of the Alliance for Responsible vital force Policy, is quoted by Maloney saying, Our position is that none of this is needed. We reinforcement renewable energy, and we support Californias renewable energy targets, but we telephone it flock be done through rooftop solar.Harvey too pointed out the success that Germany was having by use rooftop solar panels. The way it works is that the government offers payments for electricity generated from solar panels. The payment is roughly 50 cents per kW hour. The number payment in the US in 11 cents per kilowatt hour, but the payments would not be as high as the German payments here.Maloney goes on to say not only would the solar panels demolish habitats, it would propel the deserts small water supply, as it is, correct more scarce. The mirror and solar panels would adopt to be washed, and almost panels use turbines which would require more water. terry F rewin, chairman of the Sierra Clubs California/Nevada desert commitee, says that solar panels destroy all natice resources on site, and take indirect and irreversible impacts on surrounding wilderness. At the current rate of adding 200 megawatts of rooftop solar panels a year, it would take 100 years to tack the 20 percent renewable target set by California.The counterbalance major debate over a voluminous solar power project was over the 250 acres of land, which was on the outskirts of Victorville, California, on the western side of the Mojave that was gonna be used for the solar panels. Inland hire flock to look for the endangered ground squirrel and desert tortoise. No squirrels were found but some tortoises were, so the Inland, cmpany mental synthesis the panels, said for every acre of lost habitat they would get one acre of land to offset it. Although it would constitute some 6.5 million to 10 million dollars to procure the offsetting acreage.Solar PowerPeter Malon ey writes in his article, Environmentalists Against Solar Power that solar power projects are facing major scrutiny, not from the coal or oil industry, but from environmentalists. Maloney says that Southern California is pushing for solar power in the desert cause the amount of sunlight with virtually no clouds, but its also the home to the Mojave ground squirrel, the desert tortoise and the burrowing owl, and to human residents. Maloney also states that the US Bureau of Land Management says that it had applications submitted for solar power that would cover 78,490 acres in the desert. For the entire US, the number of applications grew from zero two years ago to more than 125 with enouch potential electrical power of 70,000 megawatts or the equivalent to 70 large coal plants.The rush to try and get this land is caused by a California Law that calls for 20 percent of the states electricity must come from renewable resources by 2010. Jim Harvey, who is the founder of the Alliance for Responsible Energy Policy, is quoted by Maloney saying, Our position is that none of this is needed. We support renewable energy, and we support Californias renewable energy targets, but we think it can be done through rooftop solar.Harvey also pointed out the success that Germany was having by using rooftop solar panels. The way it works is that the government offers payments for electricity generated from solar panels. The payment is roughly 50 cents per kilowatt hour. The average payment in the US in 11 cents per kilowatt hour, but the payments would not be as high as the German payments here.Maloney goes on to say not only would the solar panels destroy habitats, it would run the deserts small water supply, as it is, even more scarce. The mirror and solar panels would have to be washed, and some panels use turbines which would require more water.Terry Frewin, chairman of the Sierra Clubs California/Nevada desert commitee, says that solar panels destroy all natice resources on site, and have indirect and irreversible impacts on surrounding wilderness. At the current rate of adding 200 megawatts of rooftop solar panels a year, it would take 100 years to meet the 20 percent renewable target set by California.The first major debate over a large solar power project was over the 250 acres of land, which was on the outskirts of Victorville, California, on the western side of the Mojave that was gonna be used for the solar panels. Inland hired people to look for the endangered ground squirrel and desert tortoise. No squirrels were found but some tortoises were, so the Inland, cmpany building the panels, said for every acre of lost habitat they would buy one acre of land to offset it. Although it would cost some 6.5 million to 10 million dollars to buy the offsetting acreage.